A court in Paris has found a writer and his publisher guilty of denying the 1994 Rwandan genocidelele247 slot, apparently a first under French law. The French-Cameroonian writer, Charles Onana, author of “Rwanda, the Truth about Operation Turquoise
At the close of one of the most consequential and least constitutional terms in the Supreme Court’s history, it’s hard to ignore one particularly offensive trend: the right-wing justices’ repeated and patronizing attempts to minimize the importance
Last week, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a federal law that threatens to shut down TikTok in the United States. The court’s most consequential conclusion: The First Amendment permits the government to protect Ameri
The Supreme Court seemed prepared on Tuesday to rule that a federal agency had done enough to consider the environmental impact of a proposed 88-mile railway in Utah. Such a ruling could limit the scope of environmental reviews required by federal l
The Supreme Court on Monday turned away cases on admissions policies, gender identity and gun control, eliciting objections from conservative justices that suggested rifts on the court about whether and when to address major questions left open by r
Earlier this year, the sharply divided Supreme Court came together to decide unanimously in favor of the National Rifle Association. The N.R.A., the justices ruled, could pursue its claim that a New York State regulator had infringed on its First Am
A Chinese court sentenced a high-ranking editor and columnist for a major Communist Party newspaper to seven years in prison on espionage charges on Friday. His family said it was punishment for past writings that were critical of the government, as
TikTok asked a federal court on Monday to temporarily freeze a law that requires its Chinese parent company to sell the app or face a ban in the United States, as it looked to the Supreme Court and the incoming Trump administration to rescue it. The
As the summer of 2023 ended, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court began trading even-more-confidential-than-usual memos, avoiding their standard email list and instead passing paper documents in envelopes to each other’s chambers. Faced with ethic